diff --git a/docs/api.md b/docs/api.md
index 65c331b..d555472 100644
--- a/docs/api.md
+++ b/docs/api.md
@@ -102,6 +102,15 @@ valid JSON (`json.loads` must succeed). `csv` has no shape check beyond
 non-blank content — it's parsed leniently, first row treated as the header.
 A mismatch returns `400`.
 
+**Known limitation:** this check is substring-based, not a real HTML parse.
+It can false-positive on `html_fragment` content where those substrings are
+inert — e.g. a JS string literal inside `<script>` that legitimately
+contains the text `<html><body></body></html>` but never becomes real
+markup. Avoid the literal strings `<html`, `<!doctype`, `<body` anywhere in
+`html_fragment` content, including inside `<script>`/`<pre>` text, even when
+they're safe. (Escaped text, e.g. `&lt;html&gt;` in a `<pre>` block, is fine
+and correctly accepted — the check only fires on unescaped `<`.)
+
 Optional fields:
 
 | Field | Notes |
diff --git a/issues/009-content-shape-check-false-positive-in-script-strings.md b/issues/009-content-shape-check-false-positive-in-script-strings.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..55fd83e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/issues/009-content-shape-check-false-positive-in-script-strings.md
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+# 009 — `html_fragment` content-shape check false-positives on safe text inside `<script>` string literals
+
+**Status:** Fixed (documented as a known limitation)
+
+Follow-up to the #007 handover, which specifically asked to probe the
+`<html`/`<!doctype`/`<body`/`<section` substring checks for content
+containing those strings "inside a code block/string literal rather than
+as real markup."
+
+## Description
+
+`validate_content_shape` (added for #004) rejects `html_fragment` content
+containing the literal substrings `<html`, `<!doctype`, or `<body`
+anywhere in the text, case-insensitively — with no awareness of HTML
+structure/context. This correctly catches genuinely dangerous cases (see
+#004's original report and the escaped-vs-unescaped `<pre>` test below),
+but also rejects content where those substrings are inert — e.g. a JS
+string literal inside `<script>`, which can never become a real DOM
+element:
+
+```json
+{
+  "kind": "html_fragment",
+  "content": "<p>Config example:</p><script>const tpl = \"<html><body></body></html>\";</script>"
+}
+```
+
+→ `400 {"detail":"html_fragment must be body-only HTML; do not include doctype/html/body"}`
+
+This content is legitimate, safe, body-only HTML (a `<script>` block
+whose string contents are never parsed as markup by the browser) — a
+completely reasonable pattern for an artifact demonstrating/generating
+HTML client-side. It's rejected purely because the substring check has
+no idea it's inside a JS string.
+
+For contrast/completeness, confirmed correct behavior on two adjacent
+cases while investigating this:
+- Properly **escaped** literal HTML text in a `<pre>` block (`&lt;html&gt;`)
+  is accepted, as it should be — the check only fires on unescaped `<`.
+- **Unescaped** `<html>` inside a `<pre>` block is correctly *rejected* —
+  that's not actually a false positive, since unescaped tags inside
+  `<pre>` still get parsed as real nested elements by the browser (same
+  root cause as #004), so blocking it is correct.
+- Uppercase `<HTML>`/`<!DOCTYPE HTML>` is correctly still caught
+  (case-insensitive check works both directions — no case-based bypass),
+  and uppercase `<SECTION>` in a `deck` is correctly still accepted.
+
+So the check's case-insensitivity and escaping-awareness are both solid;
+the gap is specifically "text inside script/string context is
+indistinguishable from real markup" to a substring check.
+
+## Severity / Scope
+
+Low-to-moderate. Narrow trigger (an artifact literally about generating
+or documenting HTML client-side), and there's a workaround (escape the
+inner `<` as `&lt;` even inside `<script>`, since JS accepts HTML
+entities... actually it doesn't — entities are only decoded by the HTML
+parser, so escaping breaks the JS string value itself; the real
+workaround is string concatenation, e.g. `"<" + "html>"`, which is
+awkward). Worth a conscious call on whether this is worth fixing (real
+HTML parsing) or documenting as a known limitation, rather than treating
+it as a must-fix — a proper fix means parsing the content as HTML and
+checking node structure instead of substring matching, which is a bigger
+change than the substring-check approach #004 shipped.
+
+## Suggested Fix (pick one)
+
+- **Document as a known limitation** in `docs/api.md`'s kind table:
+  "content-shape validation is substring-based, not a real HTML parse —
+  avoid the literal strings `<html`, `<!doctype`, `<body` anywhere in
+  `html_fragment` content, including inside `<script>`/`<pre>` text."
+  Cheapest, matches the spirit of the #004 fix (mirrors the client
+  helper's own substring approach).
+- **Real fix**: parse `content` with an HTML parser (e.g. Python's
+  `html.parser` or `lxml`) and check for actual top-level `<html>`/
+  `<body>` *elements* rather than substrings. More correct, more work,
+  and adds a dependency if not using stdlib `html.parser`.
+
+## Resolution
+
+Took the cheap option, per the issue's own framing: documented as a known
+limitation in `docs/api.md` rather than implementing real HTML parsing. The
+narrow trigger (an artifact literally about generating/documenting HTML
+client-side) doesn't justify the bigger, riskier change a proper fix would
+need (parse `content` and check actual node structure instead of substrings)
+— substring matching is already the deliberate approach #004 shipped and
+that `daybook_post.py`'s own client-side check uses, so this keeps
+server/client behavior consistent rather than making the server stricter
+in a way the client can't warn about ahead of time.
diff --git a/issues/011-vetted-cdn-snippets-for-html-full.md b/issues/011-vetted-cdn-snippets-for-html-full.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ced54ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/issues/011-vetted-cdn-snippets-for-html-full.md
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+# 011 — Document vetted CDN framework snippets for `html_full`, scoped to that kind only
+
+**Status:** Fixed
+
+## Description
+
+`html_full` is documented (`SKILL.md`'s kind table) as the kind for
+"complete custom pages/frameworks" — Daybook injects nothing into it
+(`create_text_artifact`: `rendered = content` verbatim), so a poster
+wanting Tailwind, Chart.js, or similar has to already know a CDN URL and
+hand-write the `<link>`/`<script>` tags themselves. There's currently no
+guidance anywhere in `docs/` or `skills/daybook-posting/` pointing to
+known-good CDN URLs, so an agent has to search for one from scratch every
+time.
+
+Separately (found while investigating this): `daybook_post.py`'s own
+`--theme` argparse help text reads `"Example: report, tasks, bootstrap"`
+— but `bootstrap` isn't a real theme (only `report`/`tasks`/`deck`/`base`
+exist as files under `static/themes/`). Requesting it silently produces a
+`<link>` to a 404'ing stylesheet, rendering unstyled with no error. Worth
+fixing alongside this, since it's the same "help the agent avoid a dead
+end" spirit.
+
+Update: the `bootstrap` example wasn't a random typo — `planning/framework_artifact_rendering.md`
+already plans a vendored-Bootstrap-theme feature that just hasn't been built
+yet, and the help text was almost certainly written ahead of that. Worth
+linking that doc (and `planning/2026-09-02-theme_variants_and_user_palettes.md`,
+a related-but-distinct design conversation about palette variants within the
+existing theme families) when this is picked up, rather than treating the
+example as simply wrong.
+
+**Explicitly out of scope / not being requested here**: injecting CDN
+references into the *themed* kinds (`markdown`/`html_fragment`/`deck`).
+Those exist specifically so Daybook — not the poster — owns styling
+(stated principle in Daybook's own `CLAUDE.md`: "Do not make agents
+responsible for styling"), and giving agents a default-reach-for CDN
+snippet for those kinds would undermine that. This is scoped to
+`html_full` only, where the poster has already opted out of managed
+styling by choosing that kind.
+
+## Suggested Fix
+
+- Add a short, curated list of CDN snippets (Tailwind, and whatever else
+  comes up often — Chart.js is a reasonable second) to `SKILL.md`'s
+  `html_full` row or a new subsection, so agents can copy-paste instead
+  of searching. Note Tailwind's own CDN build
+  (`cdn.tailwindcss.com`) is marked "not for production" by Tailwind
+  themselves (compiles in-browser on every load) — worth linking a
+  precompiled build instead, or explicitly caveating if using the Play
+  CDN anyway for convenience.
+- Note the self-hosted/offline tension explicitly: Daybook runs locally
+  and can be deployed air-gapped; any CDN-linked artifact won't render
+  fully offline. A one-line caveat in the docs is enough — this is a
+  tradeoff to flag, not something to solve.
+- Fix the `--theme` help text's `bootstrap` example to name a real theme
+  (or drop the example value entirely and just say "see docs/api.md for
+  available themes").
+
+## Resolution
+
+Added a "CDN Snippets For `html_full`" section to `SKILL.md` with Tailwind
+(Play CDN, with a one-line caveat that it's not a production-grade build)
+and Chart.js, an explicit offline/air-gapped caveat, and a reminder that
+this is scoped to `html_full` only — never the themed kinds. Fixed
+`daybook_post.py`'s `--theme` help text (`bootstrap` was never a real theme;
+it was written ahead of the vendored-Bootstrap-theme feature described in
+`planning/framework_artifact_rendering.md`, not a random typo) to name real
+themes instead.
+
+While in `SKILL.md`'s kind cheat sheet, also found and fixed a second stale
+spot: it never mentioned the `json`/`csv` kinds added this session, and
+still told agents to use the `--as-markdown` fenced-code-block workaround
+for them even though they now have real first-class support. Updated the
+cheat sheet accordingly.
+
+That surfaced a real, separate gap: the posting *script* itself
+(`daybook_post.py`) doesn't actually support `--kind json`/`csv` yet — filed
+as issue #012 rather than fixing inline here, since it needs real script
+changes (TEXT_KINDS, auto-detection, validation), not a doc tweak.
diff --git a/issues/012-posting-script-missing-json-csv-support.md b/issues/012-posting-script-missing-json-csv-support.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1565ab4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/issues/012-posting-script-missing-json-csv-support.md
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# 012 — `daybook_post.py` doesn't know about the `json`/`csv` kinds
+
+**Status:** Open
+
+## Description
+
+Found while updating `SKILL.md`'s kind cheat sheet for issue #011.
+`artifacts/views.py` added first-class `json` and `csv` kinds, but the
+posting helper script wasn't updated alongside it:
+
+- `skills/daybook-posting/scripts/daybook_post.py`'s `TEXT_KINDS = {"markdown",
+  "html_fragment", "html_full", "deck"}` doesn't include `json`/`csv`, so
+  `--kind json` is rejected by argparse before a request is ever sent.
+- `TEXT_SUFFIXES` (used by positional auto-mode to sniff a file's kind from
+  its extension) doesn't include `.json`/`.csv` either — posting
+  `data.json` via the simple `daybook_post.py data.json` auto-mode path
+  uploads it as a generic downloadable `binary` artifact instead of using
+  the new interactive kind.
+- `validate_payload()` has no shape-check branch for `json` (mirroring the
+  server's `json.loads` validation, per how every other kind's client-side
+  check mirrors its server-side one).
+
+Net effect: the API itself supports `json`/`csv` fully (confirmed working
+via direct HTTP), but an agent following the documented, recommended
+workflow ("always use the helper script") currently cannot reach either
+kind at all.
+
+## Suggested Fix
+
+- Add `"json"`, `"csv"` to `TEXT_KINDS`.
+- Add `.json`/`.csv` to `TEXT_SUFFIXES` with matching `sniff_text_kind`
+  logic (or a clear rule — e.g. `.csv` always maps to `kind=csv`; `.json`
+  maps to `kind=json` unless some other signal suggests it's meant as
+  metadata).
+- Add a `json` branch to `validate_payload()`: attempt to parse and raise a
+  clear `ValueError` on invalid JSON, mirroring the server.
+- Add a usage example to `SKILL.md`/`docs/llm_posting_helper.md` for both
+  kinds (e.g. `daybook_post.py --kind json --content-file data.json`).
+- No test suite currently exists for this script at all (it's exercised
+  manually / via the API tests on the server side only) — worth deciding
+  whether this is finally worth a small script-level test file, or whether
+  server-side coverage is considered sufficient.
+
+## Resolution
+
+_(pending)_
diff --git a/skills/daybook-posting/SKILL.md b/skills/daybook-posting/SKILL.md
index 8eee070..0931e11 100644
--- a/skills/daybook-posting/SKILL.md
+++ b/skills/daybook-posting/SKILL.md
@@ -41,13 +41,41 @@ DAYBOOK_SOURCE=agent
 
 | Kind | Use for | Content shape |
 |---|---|---|
-| `markdown` | Reports, briefs, notes | Markdown text. |
+| `markdown` | Reports, briefs, notes | Markdown text. Fenced code blocks get syntax highlighting. |
 | `html_fragment` | Themed HTML reports/cards/tables | Body-only HTML. No `html/head/body`. |
-| `html_full` | Complete custom pages/frameworks | Full HTML document with doctype/html/head/body. |
+| `html_full` | Complete custom pages/frameworks | Full HTML document with doctype/html/head/body. See "CDN Snippets" below. |
 | `deck` | Simple slide-like artifact | Top-level `<section>...</section>` blocks. |
+| `json` | Structured data, metrics, run summaries | Valid JSON text. Renders as a collapsible tree. |
+| `csv` | Tabular data | CSV text, first row as header. Renders as a sortable/searchable table. |
 
 For images, PDFs, SVGs, and other files, use `--file`; the helper infers multipart and content type.
 
+## CDN Snippets For `html_full`
+
+`html_full` is Daybook's escape hatch for custom pages — nothing is
+injected into it, so a poster wanting Tailwind or a charting library has to
+supply its own `<link>`/`<script>` tags. Known-good ones:
+
+```html
+<!-- Tailwind (Play CDN - compiles in-browser on every load; fine for a
+     one-off artifact, not something you'd want on a high-traffic page) -->
+<script src="https://cdn.tailwindcss.com"></script>
+
+<!-- Chart.js -->
+<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/chart.js"></script>
+```
+
+**Offline caveat:** Daybook can run fully self-hosted/air-gapped. Any
+artifact that links a CDN script won't render fully (or at all, for
+Tailwind's in-browser compiler) without internet access. If the deployment
+target is offline, don't reach for these — use `markdown`/`html_fragment`
+instead, which are styled entirely server-side with no external requests.
+
+Only use this for `html_full` specifically — never add CDN references to
+`markdown`/`html_fragment`/`deck`. Those kinds exist so Daybook, not the
+poster, owns styling; injecting a default CDN habit into them would
+undermine that.
+
 ## Images Inside Content
 
 To embed an image *within* a markdown or HTML artifact (rather than posting it as its own
diff --git a/skills/daybook-posting/scripts/daybook_post.py b/skills/daybook-posting/scripts/daybook_post.py
index cc8c9a8..5c92249 100644
--- a/skills/daybook-posting/scripts/daybook_post.py
+++ b/skills/daybook-posting/scripts/daybook_post.py
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ def parse_args():
     parser.add_argument("--content-file", help="Read text artifact content from this file.")
     parser.add_argument("--file", help="Upload this file as image/pdf/binary, or render as markdown with --as-markdown.")
     parser.add_argument("--tags", help="Comma-separated tags.")
-    parser.add_argument("--theme", help="Theme for markdown/html_fragment. Example: report, tasks, bootstrap.")
+    parser.add_argument("--theme", help="Theme for markdown/html_fragment. Example: report, tasks, base. See docs/api.md for the current list.")
     parser.add_argument("--meta", action="append", default=[], help="Metadata key=value. Repeatable.")
     parser.add_argument("--meta-json", help="Metadata JSON object. Merged with --meta values.")
     parser.add_argument("--source-name", help="Human-readable source name. Defaults to --source.")