make_room_for() read usage before any write lock was held, so concurrent
requests could each read stale data and both conclude "this fits" -
confirmed reproducible (measured 616 bytes over a 1551-byte quota with 5
truly concurrent posts).
Fix: force SQLite to acquire its write lock immediately via a no-op UPDATE
on the user's UserProfile row, before reading `used`, wrapped in
transaction.atomic() through the subsequent Artifact.objects.create() so
the lock is held across the whole eviction+insert sequence. Added a 20s
DB timeout as headroom for legitimate contention.
Deliberately no retry/backoff logic - this project's actual load (a
low-volume self-hosted tool) doesn't need it, and SQLite has no row-level
locking regardless, so quota-affecting writes serialize globally either
way. Did fix a real bug found while verifying this: exception handling
around artifact creation only caught QuotaExceeded, so a genuine lock
timeout left the just-written file orphaned on disk - both call sites now
clean up on any exception.
Verified live against the real dev instance (twice, with 5 truly
simultaneous posts against a tight quota) rather than via an automated
test - Django's in-memory shared-cache test database uses a different,
non-retryable SQLite locking model that fails for reasons unrelated to
this fix's correctness.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Django had no CSRF_TRUSTED_ORIGINS and no SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER, so
it always treated requests as plain HTTP. Login over HTTPS behind
Apache/Nginx failed CSRF verification as a result.
Daybook: a self-hosted, multi-user Django + DRF app where agents, scripts,
or people publish artifacts and each logged-in user browses their own
time-ordered, label-filterable feed.
This squashes prior local development history (kept privately on a separate
branch) into a single clean starting point for the public repository.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
